home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1180 / 1180r055.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  79KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky
OCR: would not apply. and the severity of the owner's loss would be irrelevant. Although at "innocent exception presently exists under $881(a)(7}, there appears to n0 constitu itional prohibition against Congress 1I State legisla- ure enacting law that would forfeit DFO innocent homeowners, ar they have for other kinds of least acording to Calero- Toledo) At aly rate innocent owner cannot forestall the initial seizure under the ox Darte procedure employed by the govennent. The foregoing example is not a strawman. 21 U.S.C. 3881(b) says the goverment may exuctly what has Just been deseribed (and does you everi require the magistrate's ruling) The owne can dispossessed until trial on the merits, unless his or her case can be proven by undisputed facts on summary judgrnent The orly thing which wou ...